1. Teaching and the faculty
2. Academic results
5. Labour market insertion of graduates and their satisfaction with the training received
6. Satisfaction of the different groups involved
7. Attention to suggestions and complaints
8. Dissemination of the study plan, its development and results
9. Criteria and procedures for the temporary or definitive suspension of official postgraduate degrees
10. Students’ opinion on the teaching performance of the faculty
The Master’s CGIC annually analyses the information related to the eight core aspects of the study plan’s monitoring and evaluation. Based on these analyses, the Academic Committee prepares each year the Preliminary Monitoring Self-Report, documenting the system indicators, highlighting good practices, identifying weaknesses and proposing improvements.
Internal Quality Assurance System of the Master in Visual Arts and Education
| Indicators | ||
|---|---|---|
| Graduation rate | Percentage of students who complete the programme within the expected duration or within one additional academic year, relative to their entry cohort. | |
| Dropout rate | Percentage of new-entry students who should have obtained the degree the previous year but did not enrol in that year or the year before. | |
| Efficiency rate | Percentage ratio between the total number of credits graduates should have enrolled in and the total number actually enrolled. | |
| Performance rate | Percentage ratio between the total number of credits passed (excluding adapted, recognised or validated credits) and the total number of enrolled credits. | |
| 10/11 | 11/12 | 12/13 | 13/14 | 14/15 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graduation rate | |||||
| Dropout rate | |||||
| Efficiency rate | |||||
| Performance rate | |||||